Introduction
The demand for case study help is on the rise due to case study reviews being popular in the academic arena. From time immemorial, scholars have relied on their colleagues to evaluate their research papers to identify whether they are of the required standard by various journal articles. The case study help reviews mostly entail an evaluation of whether the papers are believable and whether they are robust enough to achieve their purpose – to give in-depth information about the topic under investigation. Hence, reviewers (peer-reviewers) evaluate various elements determining the believability of the study, as well as the elements that determine the robustness of the study. Against this backdrop, this paper aims to conduct a critical review of the Jory case study help review.
Elements Determining the Believability of the Study
A major element that determines a study’s believability is how well the paper is written. To identify this, we evaluate the author’s writing style, their qualifications, the report abstract and the title. In evaluating the study’s writing style, there is evidence to show that the report is written in a grammatically correct language. Moreover, there is little use of jargon, meaning that the language can easily be understood by many readers.
The researchers’ names and their institutions are also given. For instance, it is stated that Jory is from the University of Southampton, Benamraoui is from the University of Westminster, Boojihawon is from the University of Birmingham, while Madichie is from London School of Business and Management. The institutions from which researchers originate are great indicators of their qualifications because most universities only allow qualified researchers to engage in research. Hence, it can be concluded that the authors, from a review of their respective universities of origin, are knowledgeable and qualified to engage in the study.
A good case study help review paper must have an accurate, clear and unambiguous title. In this regard, a review of Jory and colleagues’ study reveals a clearly stated research topic which is accurate and unambiguous. Stated as ‘the net present value analysis and the wealth creation process: a case illustration’, the authors clearly show the readers that the study is about the net present value (NPV) and they will use a case illustration to conduct an analysis of NPV in wealth creation process. Hence, a conclusion can be made that the case study help title is good enough to influence the believability of the study.
An abstract in any research report is a key element that gives the reader a snapshot of the study’s objective, methodology, findings, and conclusion. Hence, according to any research report whose abstract does not have these elements can be considered a substandard report. Nonetheless, an evaluation of Jory and colleagues’ report indicate a well-written abstract that contains all these information. Hence, we can conclude that the study’s abstract section is good enough to warrant its consideration as a quality research report.
Elements Determining the Robustness of the Study
The study by Jory is robust due to its well-stated research problem identification. For instance, the study argues that while NPV is often used in the determination of viable projects, it is imperative to distinguish the portions of the free cash flows owed to different parties within the company such as the finance suppliers and the shareholders. Yet, according to Jory, there is a dearth of literature illustrating how these the shareholder and finance supplier elements of capital budgeting is separated, as well as how and when money owed to them is paid. Moreover, according to Jory, they illustrate when a project starts to generate returns for their shareholders, a separate group from the finance suppliers.
The quality of a case study help research report is also determined by the manner in which is logically presented. A good research report must be presented in a logically consistent manner where steps are followed in a naturally flowing manner. A review of Jory and colleagues’ study reveal a well-followed structure from the introductory part to the conclusion part. Moreover, the other parts of the study (i.e. literature review, study methodology, discussion, and conclusion) are also arranged in a logically flowing manner, to allow the reader to easily comprehend and relate the various section of the study. Hence, it can be concluded that the case study help paper is logically organized as per the standard requirements in academic research.
The study has also included a critical review of literature from primary research. For instance, the authors a reference is made to several other studies. A good study has a well-balanced literature review of previous studies and Jory do exactly that. Therefore, the nature of Jory and colleagues’ literature review contribute to the robustness of their study.
Apart from literature review, another element that determines whether a research report is robust is the availability of theoretical framework. According to APA Publication and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards, theoretical framework indicates that the study is grounded on known theories, adding to the credibility of the study. In their study, Jory make a reference to the theory of capital budgeting and the cost of capital investment theory. This shows that the study is well grounded on a strong theoretical framework, making the study more robust.
Another important element influencing the robustness of a research report is its methodology section.in this regard, write that a research report must reveal the research design used as well as the data gathering techniques. Moreover, according to the author, there must be a reliable and credible testing mechanism accompanied by a discussion of the results. A review of Jory reveals the same characteristics. For instance, the study uses a working example to hypothetically illustrate a case to show how investment cash flow returns are distributed to various stakeholders in the form of repayment to finance suppliers, income to finance suppliers and distributions to company shareholders.
Hence, in conclusion, the study by Jory can be said to be of good quality and believable as evidenced by its writing style, author qualification, report title, and abstract. Moreover, the case study help paper has proven its robustness by identifying its purpose, and by being arranged in a logical manner. The study is also robust due to the availability of a critical literature review, theoretical framework, and a well-stated research methodology.
References
Jory R, Benamraoui A, Benamraoui A, Boojihawon R, Nnamdi O. Net Present Value Analysis and the Wealth Creation Process: A Case Illustration. 2016; 12; 85-99.
For More Visit: Assignment Help Online
